There is a whole lot of debate going on right now over the decision of New Jersey Division of Family Services decision to remove Adolf Hitler Campbell, 3, and his younger sisters JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, 1, and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell, 8 months, from their home. The DFS people insist that it has nothing to do with the names the degenerate parents burdened these kids with. So far the most informative article can be found on ABC. The loudest dissent comes from people concerned that the government is infringing upon the liberties of these two dirt bags. Keep in mind that neither of the parents work, they both sponge off the state. Daddy has the house decorated with Nazi memorabilia, and both mom and dad are crazy as shit house rats. The debate swirling around is really a moot point, since the state denies they took the kids based on their names. Still it begs the question should the kids be removed from their bunker based on the names. Are the names a form of abuse, and if so does that over ride the parents rights to free speech? I say Yes on both counts. Saddling a child with a name that is synonymous with the mass annihilation of entire bloodlines is abuse. Knowing that the child will face a lifetime of ridicule and ostracising based upon that name is abuse. You can't hinder someones right to "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ", and claim protection under the first amendment. And if you think being named Adolf Hitler won't ruin this kids life, then you are as crazy as his parents.
I grew up in the same town these sick people live in. It's a mostly white farming community, we didn't have a single person of color in my entire high school - and the demographics haven't changed much since then. Whenever my African American husband and I visit my mom who still lives there, you can't imagine the stares we get. Quite frankly I'm glad the state removed the kids from the family - I wish the state would change the kids names for them too!
ReplyDeleteAs much as I think the state should stay out of my business, the state should have not allowed these parents to name their kids what they did.
ReplyDeleteAnd someone needs to take these parents out back to the whoppin' shed.
You seem to be blogging a lot about satan spawn.
ReplyDeleteGod some little satans in the works?
I hate to say it Midtown, but you're as wrong as a Roseanne Barr porno video on this one.
ReplyDeleteThe kids' lives aren't ruined by their names. They were pretty much ruined at the moment of conception just by virtue of who their parents are.
The article you linked said the parents weren't charged with a crime and that police had received no complaints about the family, so I'm pretty suspicious at this point.
I don't know what reason the state had for removing the kids, but if it had anything to do with the political leanings of the parents, ignorant and misguided as they are, then it's an overstepping of government power.
Ironically, that's the kind of thing a certain political group in Germany was famous for a few years ago.
emawkc "I hate to say it Midtown, but you're as wrong as a Roseanne Barr porno video on this one. "
ReplyDeleteewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww thanks for that visual!
---
This one is hard MM. Yeah I think the douche bags were wrong to name their kid that. I also know about 5 girls names Margarita and two named Marijuana - parents are wrong there too. Still, it's legal here to name your kid anything you want, and while it's legal the state shouldn't take them away because of an f'ed up name.
I think all babies look like Winston Churchill. But the one you have posted does look like Hitler : )
ReplyDeleteI think the state should force renaming the kids on their birth certificates. The parents can call them anything they want at home. Hey, being called "you lil shit" didn't effect me any : ) I also think the state should worry about these two breeding any more.
There was a comment on that article from someone who must know one of the neighbors that turned the parents in. hey said, The neighbors noted odd and dysfunctional behavior concerning the children and were concerned. I feel bad for the parents. The parents loved having negative attention focused on themselves and they sought it at the expense of their children." And I fully agree with that statement. I hope the investigation comes out on the side of assisting those poor children.
ReplyDeleteAs a government bureaucrat by trade, I can tell you one thing. There had to be evidence that something other than poor naming involved to motivate a government agency to get off their collective buts and do something. Basically there has to be some evidence that would at least stand up to an initial glance in a court of law to justify making such a move. Most likely the parents are nutty as a pair of loons, and the kids are being neglected. The fact that both adults are living off of disability and have no gainful employment is unusual to say the least and suggests some possible scamming. Add in the home decorating ala the Third Reich, and I'm guessing mama and papa aren't quite flying on all cylinders. It's possible a neighbor spotted one of the youngsters running around in an unchanged dirty diaper on a regular basis or exhibiting some uber-destructive behavior like setting things on fire or torturing animals, all classic signs of a lack of supervision and possible neglect. That is enough to trigger an investigation I'm guessing.
ReplyDelete