I read a story in the L A Times over the weekend about two women, apparently in a relationship, who were arrested and charged with the torture of one of their children, a 5 year old boy. They withheld food, burned him on his genitals with cigarettes, and treated him in a manner that was reprehensible. It was hard to read, and difficult to comprehend how a mother could abuse her own child in such a horrible manner. And then I came across this story, linked by Crime Scene Kansas City.
A man stops his truck in the middle of a road. He walks around to the passenger side of his vehicle. Snatches a toddler out of the car seat, and proceeds to stomp and beat the child to death in the middle of the road. Witnesses say they attempted to stop the man but claim he was so intent on what he was doing that he didn't pay any attention to them. A sheriffs deputy in a helicopter was the first on the scene. They land, order the guy to stop, he ignores the deputy, the deputy shoots him dead. Take a minute to get your head around all of that, I know I had to.
After reading the Modesto papers report, I looked around and found this one. The paper says that people passing by called 911, apparently at least one of them, a fireman physically tried to stop the guy, but this was well in to the beating and probably too late. The thing is, several people apparently witnessed this and called it in, but did little to nothing to intervene. There is an often repeated line about how you never know how you will react in a situation unless you actually go through it. Bullshit. Some situations, like a baby getting stomped in the street, are no brainers. Any decent human being knows how they would react in this situation, you would stop it, at any cost. If it meant caving this animals skull in with whatever you could pick up, or possibly being attacked yourself, how could anyone do less than that. The report doesn't say anyone ever attempted to get their hands on the child and run with him, the report doesn't say that these people calling 911 did much of anything.
Then we have the story of an old man hit by a car in Hartford Conn.. A surveillance tape catches it all. Witnesses again do nothing. One guy circles him on his bike and continues on about his business. In the tape you see people walk by like the guy isn't laying in the middle of the street. Cars drive around him, people gawk from the sidewalk, but do nothing.
I know what you are thinking. Okay MM, you have depressed me and impressed upon me Mans inhumanity to Man, so whats your point?
We are a society of do gooders. We save the seals, we feed the children, we walk for breast cancer, we trick or treat for UNICEF, whatever, pick your cause. Now these are all good things to do, every single one of them is a noble cause, but...............,there is this other side to people. We don't want to get involved, when it really matters. We especially don't want to get involved if it means putting ourselves in harms way. Before anyone takes this as a personal assault on their character let me be clear, I'm not referring to anyone directly, but society in general. I hope and believe that many of us would do whats right, and not just turn their head the other way. But society as a whole , as evidenced by these two stories, is unwilling to really help, if helping means putting yourself in harms way.
People slip a buck to a homeless guy on the corner and tell themselves they are GOOD. We give to some cause and believe it makes us decent people. We do a little something, and walk away feeling better about ourselves. I'm not knocking that, I do it myself, but that doesn't necessarily make me a good person. It also doesn't make someone a bad person, but lets face it, giving a few bucks here and there doesn't make a real difference to the giver or the receiver. It's just something we do automatically, to assuage guilt or because we feel pity for someone.
The people who did little to nothing in these two stories are not good people. they can tithe to the church or go work in a soup kitchen, or do whatever passes for their definition of charity, but it doesn't change reality. the reality is this. When it really mattered, when they could have really done something, they did nothing. When all of these people were calling 911 as a man stomped a child to an unrecognizable pulp, not one of them stopped the guy. Nobody tackled him, nobody picked something up and split his head open, nobody tried to grab the child and run away, not one of these people did enough, until the fireman and police arrived. As an old man laid in the middle of a busy city street, nobody rushed out to check on him, or hold his hand to comfort him, nobody did enough. These were not good people, and that's all there is to it.
I've become convinced over the passed few years that society has become conditioned to believe that they can pay someone else to do the good things.
ReplyDeletePay charities/government to take care the homeless/hungry/lazy/etc. If we give enough of our (well, other peoples') taxes to the government, then we don't have to sully ourselves with getting involved.
Problem is, as you imply, it's not just our money that we're giving up.
Very good point you are making here...I completely agree! I have some friends that would just stand-by b/c they don't want to "get involved"; F*** that, there is no way I could just stand-by in any of the situations you discussed! It seems as if some people do nothing because they assume someone else will call the police, or tend to the injured man, or tackle the man beating the child; you can't rely on that though b/c what if someone else doesn't step-in. I was driving down the street one day and saw a child, about 3yrs of age, wondering the street without an adult; I stopped and made sure the child got back home. What if I hadn't stopped, and then on the 6 o'clock news I heard of that same child being hit by a car, or kidnapped, that would of been on my conscience forever. I would of felt horrible. I didn't think of the possible reprocutions of "getting involved" at the time I stopped, I just wanted that child to be safe and that was my only thought at the time! I didn't even think twice. And, I wasn't even in a neighborhood I was familiar with, in fact I was in a fairly crime-ridden neighborhood, but the child's safety was first and foremost in my mind.
ReplyDeleteGreat story, I just wanted to bring up the recent story about the lady who helped the cop and ended up doing 10 months in jail.You help a cop and that happens.I think it makes me think about what i would do.I guess you just dont really know until something happens.
ReplyDeleteI'm a 47-year-old woman, but I've been in a few barroom brawls as a younger person. I can imagine myself putting the dude in a choke hold and biting him, somewhere, anywhere I could get a hold, pulling his hair, just like in a great chick fight. I hope if I find myself in a situation like that I will have the balls to do this. Love, Rosie.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the guy in Conn., the least anyone had to do to help this guy would have been to stand out in the street and wave their arms out in front of them to try to stop traffic..wouldn't ya think..until you really think about the guy who hit him in the first place and realize society is so fucked up you could be the next one hit. I really wonder what I would have done.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, if I had a gun on me I would have shot that bastard who beat the baby and not even thought twice about it.
Your post made me wonder about myself.
Thank you so much for this article! I'm young,not quite high school aged, and I'm doing a project on exactly this topic, 'What Defines a good Person'. I believe our unwillingness to act starts (as all things seem to)at a young age. The second you don't stand up to a bully, hurting some poor kid is the second you become a bystander and a bystander is never under any circumstance a good person. I know this sounds strange but I almost believe the reason we have so many bystanders is because of technology. WE believe we can just call for help and we're doing 'our part' , not get involved but what we don't realize is that takes to long. Frankly I wish I could be at all of these tragic events, because frankly I know without a doubt I would help. I know most people who are reading this right now would probably help because we're taking the time to wonder what It even means to be a good person.
ReplyDeleteThanks again for the article.
Your article sort of annoys me.
ReplyDeleteTo begin, you are entirely right; I think it is wrong to beat a child, or hit an old man with your car and run. That is definitely a wrong thing to do.
However, you preach that all people who did nothing about it are 'bad people'. Let me guess; you have never "tackled [a man], or picked something up and split [a man's] head open".
You are just as much of a bystander as anyone here. If you were in these situations you probably wouldn't have helped. You would love to say you would; BUT YOU WOULDN'T!
Take a look at the Bystander Effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bystander_effect