Everyone and their second cousin has chimed in on the P&L district Dress Code Brawl currently taking place. Up until now I've kept my mouth closed and my trigger finger off the caps lock key. For those of you who don't hail from our fair city, here is the dealio in a nutshell. The P&L district is a revitalized area downtown. By revitalized, I mean to say, they gutted about 8 square blocks of history and replaced it with an ugly ass mirror ball called the Sprint Center, along with a slew of bars and over priced eateries. The people running the show implemented a dress code, which basically restricts access to anyone in saggy pants and white T shirts. In other words, young black guys and young white guys with identity issues who strive and fail to be young black guys.
This is a sensitive issue, on the one hand you have nut jobs like Carol ( I think we shared the same federal parole officer) Coe. On the other you have Shaun ( call me a quote whore) Edwards. Edward is a movie critic, and a black guy. Coe is a convicted felon, welcome to my world, who loves to double down on the race card. The thing they share in common, besides race, they are both as full of shit as a Christmas Goose. Edwards recently caught more than a little flack over a review of the movie Gran Torino. He said the film was racist. Actually, the film was about a racist, so yeah there were some racial elements to the movie. Captain Obvious got his drawers in a wad and gave the movie, which was critically acclaimed, a poor rating. He then apologized a few days later. Back Pedal much? Now Edwards is the Token Black Guy supporting the dress code. Coe just likes to throw a monkey wrench in the works, it's what she does.
Lets just get to the heart of the matter, Cordish doesn't want young black guys, especially of the over sized evening gown length white T shirt variety, mudding up the water and scaring off the credit card laden Abercrombie crowd. In defense of Cordish, one need only look at the mayhem created by young black guys in Westport. They drove away business, the crime rate soared, people were robbed, beat, mugged and killed. I know that statement will offend some people, but it's true none the less. That said, those crimes were not committed by every single kid who dressed like an extra from The Wire. What Cordish will soon find out is that you can't shoot the whole litter because one pup has fleas.
Suburban White people are afraid of Urban Black people, mmmmkay. The sleepy eyed black kid, bustin a sag and sportin the giant T shirt is the face of crime. We see them on the news, getting loaded in to the Paddy Wagon, we see them in shows like The Wire, slingin dope and indiscriminately murdering one another. Now white people who live in the core of the city know better. We know that every young black kid with poor fashion sense isn't going to kill us for 2 bucks. A big T shirt doesn't automatically come with a Glock, and a hat cocked sideways does not a killer make. When I walk the dogs around the block here in Midtown, it isn't uncommon to pass a few young black folks. I have yet to be robbed, shot, killed, maimed, or beat down. In fact, I usually get a head nod, or a how's it goin.
Cordish is worried about the bottom line, and for good reason. Killing the dress code in the P&L district will effect the bottom line. There will be fewer free spending white folks and more less than free spending black folks. It will hurt business. Too bad. This is the 21st century, you can't discriminate. If you don't want young black guys to show up, then turn the P&L district in to one big country bar, otherwise learn to live with integration. Will there be a spike in crime downtown once the dress code is killed, probably. Will people point and say "I told you so", you betcha. It's easy to not get excited about the day in day out Wild West atmosphere on the city's east side. While we don't like to admit it, and will adamantly deny it, there is a "fuck em and anybody who looks like em" attitude pervasive in this city. In other words, it's perfectly acceptable for young black guys to kill one another, and anyone who gets in the way, as long as they do it east of Troost. When they start encroaching west of that line, it suddenly becomes a problem.
Here's the problem. The majority of black people, even those in size 8 billion XL Tshirts, aren't killers, dope dealers, rapers of white women. The majority of the folks east of Troost are just regular people with the same problems as the rest of us, and then some. We should care that they are not safe on their own porch, in their parks, on their streets. The truth is, we don't really care unless it threatens to effect us directly. But we, and by we, I mean our local government and John Q me and you, should care. If for no other reason than our own safety and well being. Other than the dope trade, the real money as far as criminal activity is concerned, lies west of Troost. If I'm going to rob someone, I'm not going to hit some poor schmo coming out of Crown Liquor on the East side, I'm going to get some of that Waldo scrilla (money). So when we ignore the plight of the regular folks on the east side, we enable the criminal element to run rampant through the city.
Complacency and racial disparity are every ones worst enemy. Eventually we have to face that. We can't build a wall to separate us. Killing the dress code will be the beginning of the end for the P&L district, it's almost certain, and that's a good thing. It will bring to the forefront the heart of the problem. We need to address the ongoing issue of crime on the east side. Sadly we have to be hit in the pocket book before we give a rats ass. I think several hundred thugged out black guys invading the land of Ostrich sushi and 8 dollar micro brew is just what the doctor ordered. Like it or not, at the end of the day, we are all effected by crime, whether it takes place at 43rd and Wayne, or 47th and Main.
Great post!
ReplyDelete"The sleepy eyed black kid, bustin a sag and sportin the giant T shirt is the face of crime."
ReplyDeleteTake out the word "black" and I completely agree with this quote.
I took a visiting relative who sags and bags and wears his ballcap pulled down over his eyebrows up to my 7-11 so he could get some black and milds.
On the way back he was complaining how the clerk was eyeballing him the whole time and how he always gets that treatment and blah, blah, blah. I explained to him that nine times out of ten when that store gets robbed the guy is dressed like him. Why wouldn't they keep an eye on him?
Don't want to be treated like a gangster? Don't wear the uniform.
People in JoCo and North of the river already have places to go to. with every crime report P&L is losing customers.
ReplyDeletenice post!
ReplyDeleteHow can a government force a dress code on a private business or decree a private business cannot have one? Should KC Mo decree that the Plaza III's dress code of Business Casual must be changed because saggy pants obviously don't meet that criteria? Or, is the Plaza off limits?
ReplyDeleteNo shoes, no shirt, no service at the 7-11. Is that illegal or racist too?
If I was Cordish or any other business where the government forced me to a specific dress code, I'd sue.
Nice rant MM.
ReplyDeleteWithout a big tennat(NBA, NHL) at the Sprint Center, the whole "downtown revitalization" project is doomed. The P&L district was built to cater to people going to the Sprint Center. No big events = no big money coming into downtown.
And Now NHL21 is talking about the NY Islanders coming here?!?! Gimme a break. They are gonna do the same thing as Pittsburgh did to us: use us as a bargaining chip back home. That is, after they hear us give them an offer that blows their minds.
Hockey Fan Papias
"-then turn the P&L district in to one big country bar-"
ReplyDeleteI have to admit, this part made me snort out loud.
I'm torn on this issue. On on side, I totally see why they want the dress code. Like you said, all you have to do is look to Westport as an example. I used to like going to Westport. After getting harassed by the White Tent Shirt Patrol, I never went back.
On the same token, Coe has a point (and it pains me to write that)...why come down on the guys and what they wear, and still allow women to wear stuff that was clearly meant for Playboy...or your bedroom.
On the other end of the spectrum, I don't think it's appropriate for C&C to pick and chose who gets to play in their yuppie playground when they are subsidized by taxpayer dollars.
So, in the end we have a stalemate of sorts.
I, however, have never even set foot in P&L. I'd rather go to KC-based businesses for enjoyment and pay a lot less. Maybe if P&L had some locally-owned stuff, I'd be more inclined to go.
Good rant. Although I don't think what we need to talk about is race. I think we need to talk about class. Isn't that what this all about?
ReplyDeleteWhite people don't mind the "respectable" black people -- but the "scary" ones, that's a different topic.
I have to agree with anonymous above though, if you don't want to get grouped into the class of
"The sleepy eyed kid, bustin a sag and sportin the giant T shirt that is the face of crime" -- then don't wear the uniform.
I don't want to be put associated with the white suburban douchebags...so I make sure I don't look like one when I go out. My wife prefers to not be mistaken for a prostitute, so she leaves the knee-high leather boots and the skirt that barely covers the goods at home.
But if you want to dress like you stepped out of a rap video about killing people, then don't complain when people treat you as such -- 'cause as Chris Rock would say, you're wearin' the uniform.
I think the dress code is absolutely needed and have yet to see anyone provide any evidence whatsoever that it is being applied unfairly and discriminatorialy.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I to want to correct one unrelated sentence in your post:
"they gutted about 8 square blocks of history"
Actually they gutted about 8 square blocks of surface parking lots. There was a drive-thru bank and maybe a dozen scattered small buildings here and there. Most were long empty, except for a strip club, a sandwich shop, and a place that made rubber stamps.
Before: http://tinyurl.com/d43xc2
After: http://tinyurl.com/8ezm3y
I'll take "After" any day.
I don't pay much attention to race, it's generally not an issue with me. But anyone who dresses like a gangbanger will be getting extra attention. And in my eyes, if your butt is hanging out, then you must be advertising what you are selling. And I know a few guys willing to make a play for that product. (evil grin) You come to my office looking like that, you gonna get thumped and embarassed. You come to my home looking like that, you gonna get shot. Plain and simple.
ReplyDeleteVery good post and I agree with your sentiment. I also strongly agree with the poster above who said
ReplyDelete"On the other end of the spectrum, I don't think it's appropriate for C&C to pick and chose who gets to play in their yuppie playground when they are subsidized by taxpayer dollars."
The PL will win in this case. All they have to do is site health and safety. Then bring up before and after stats for Westport. Also, siting the plaza. My mom always said, dress like you want o be treated. Sadly, first impressions are still the instinctual way to determine friend or foe. Act the fool. Get ignored.
ReplyDeleteI think they should encourage all punks, gang bangers, whatevah to dress in those huge baggy pants that are sitting below their asses. From what I've seen on COPS they're pretty easy to catch because their pants fall down to around their ankles when they try to run. They have to blurr out all their asses on cam.
ReplyDeleteIf it weren't for the WWE coming to town I don't think I would ever go to the Sprint Center or the Power & Light District.
ReplyDeleteI never go to P&L but I am with them on their dress code and hope they succeed because it is good for the city. Throughout college and for a couple of years after I worked in the bar/restaurant industry and this is going to be painful for some people to read but still it is true: If you want something to fail, especially a bar, cater to black people. Chris Rock said it and it's true.
ReplyDeleteask anybody who has ever worked in the industry. Is the dress code intended to keep certain people out? Yes. Are those people probably black? Yes. Are the people being targeted for this dress code have good reason to be targeted? Absolutely. Walk the gauntlet in Westport and tell me they don't have a problem. Remember the girl who was a microbiologist that was murdered in Wesport last year for gas money? She (and others) were the victims of violent crime comitted by the exact people P&L is trying to keep out.
Papias-I think you're assuming a lot regarding the Sprint Center finding an anchor tenant and the success or failure of downtown. I personally believe they are mutually exclusive, and besides, it's completely off topic, don't you think?
ReplyDeleteAnon March 09-Is it really "sad" that first impressions determine friend or foe? What other information do you have about a stranger than their appearance? I'd say most of the time first impressions hold an element of truth about that person's character.
Finally, Cordish is absolutely allowed to have a dress code, and it isn't racist. If anyting, it's classist, as another person has commented above. If one single person gets killed in the District (a place I only go to shop for groceries, but that's beside the point), the whole thing goes belly up, and takes downtown with it. Why can't they enforce a dress code? I too don't see a compelling argument to be made against it.
I have to agree with many posters.
ReplyDeleteThe hard reality of life is that when that dress code drops, so does the P&L district's fortunes and kiss good bye our tax money investment when that happens.
One anonymous poster pointed to the saddest bit of reality: cater to a hip hop crowd and the business ends. The math is simple. Folks who dress in hip hop style in this metro area are not big time rappers with record contracts and money to burn. No, they're ordinary people who for cultural or personal reasons want to imitate their favorite rapper or gangster, precisely because they don't have the financial resources to live that lifestyle and wish they could. In other words, their lack of financial opportunity is why many fantasize and live vicariously through their fashion. They don't have money, so they don't spend what they don't have. They just "hang out" and act like they do.
Well, acting like you have money doesn't pay the bills for a business. Those hip hop wannabes arrive in a location and plant themselves not so they can have dinner or enjoy drinks with their friends, but to look like they could. They're play acting. And their act takes away floor space, tables, and time from what could be spent on legitimate customers wanting to spend money. Furthermore, one in a hundred of these wannabes wants to do more than just play act. He wants to get money to feed his hip hop lifestyle aspirations, so he brings a gun and decides to take what he can't legitimately earn. That one person literally becomes the destroyer of worlds. He destroys the worlds of his victim and the victim's loved ones by taking a life. He destroys the worlds of the businesses associated with the location of the crime by scaring of customers. And finally, he destroys the worlds of all his hip hop brethren who want to be accepted but can't because his crime has reinforced fears and prejudices. It's a vicious, but true cycle.
So yep, the dress codes is unethical, but it's also the only guarantee that that particular young person doesn't insert himself into a situation that will bring worlds collapsing down. It's something to think about.